ABIT BH6 Part IV
Up ABIT BH6 Part I ABIT BH6 Part II ABIT BH6 Part III ABIT BH6 Part IV ABIT BH6 Page Part V ABIT BH6 Page 1 (C) ABIT BH6 Part 2 (C)

Up
Hardware Sales/Swap
Overclockers' Forum
PC Asylum's Price List
Hardware One
Talk to me

V3-URL
I got it for free at http://come.to

ABIT BH6 Part IV
by Overclocker (8/8/98)

Benchmarks

Winstone 98 Results running at 4 x 100 on ABIT BH6 with 64Mb RAM

Winstone 98/Business Winstone 98:Winstone 98 scores (Winstone units)

19.3

Winstone 98/Business SS/Database:Winstone 98 scores (Winstone units)

1.59

Winstone 98/Business Publishing:Winstone 98 scores (Winstone units)

2.04

Winstone 98/Business WP:Winstone 98 scores (Winstone units)

2.1

Winstone 98/Business Browsers:Winstone 98 scores (Winstone units)

2.51

 

Wintnue 98 Results running at 4 x 100 on ABIT BH6 with SiS6326 AGP Card with 64Mb RAM

CPU (1) Intel Pentium II with MMX@400 MHz
Video Board SiS 6326
Video Mode 800x600@16bits/pixel
RAM 64 MB
OS Windows 98 4.10.1998

 

Area Tested Value
CPU Integer 1128.116 MIPS
CPU Floating Point 459.9769 MFLOPS
Video(2D) 30.01267 MPixels/s
Direct3D 24.33615 MPixels/s
OpenGL 9.264983 MPixels/s
Memory 589.9252 MB/s
Cached Disk 59.39073 MB/s
Uncached Disk 2.171608 MB/s

9/8/98 - I wanted to post the results of running BH6 at 448Mhz but some strange problems arouse while I tried to boot up my machine on the ABIT BH6 using the 2 pieces of Hyundai PC-66 SDRAM (HY57V168010A T-10 9747A Korea and HY57V168010A T-10 9733A Korea). The two pieces of 32Mb that used to work on my BX6 at 448Mhz cannot boot Windows 98 at all. I wondered why. Some incompatibility issues I presume. Yesterday, I tested the to run  at 448Mhz with my friends Hyundai PC-100 SDRAM and there were no hangs at all. It looks like I need to go and buy a piece of PC-100 -7ns RAM and in order to test out the high speeds.

I will try again later to boot the machine at 448Mhz. Two days ago, it ran at 448Mhz using one piece of the Hyundai PC-66 32Mb module. Since the two Hyundai PC-66 SDRAM are of different makes, I suppose that is the problem. I will check it out keep you posted here.

9/8/98 (3:24pm) - I took out the PC-66 SDRAM (HY57V168010A T-10 9747A Korea) and set the speed to 112 x 4. The system boots up into Windows 98 without any problems. It certainly shows that although serial numbers can be the same, the yield might be a bit different. I am now typing this report on my BH6 using a 32Mb module.

It looks like I will have to use the 32Mb to test the speed at 112 x 4 = 448Mhz. Below are the results from WinStone98 and Wintune98.

Winstone 98 Results running at 4 x 112 on ABIT BH6 with 32Mb RAM

Winstone 98/Business Winstone 98:Winstone 98 scores (Winstone units)

18.3

Winstone 98/Business SS/Database:Winstone 98 scores (Winstone units)

1.55

Winstone 98/Business Publishing:Winstone 98 scores (Winstone units)

1.88

Winstone 98/Business WP:Winstone 98 scores (Winstone units)

1.95

Winstone 98/Business Browsers:Winstone 98 scores (Winstone units)

2.58

Wintnue 98 Results running at 4 x 112 on ABIT BH6 with SiS6326 AGP Card with 32Mb RAM.

CPU (1) Intel Pentium II with MMX@438 MHz
Video Board SiS6326
Video Mode 800x600@16bits/pixel
RAM 32 MB
OS Windows 98 4.10.1998

 

Area Tested Value
CPU Integer 1262.993 MIPS
CPU Floating Point 512.6004 MFLOPS
Video(2D) 31.0557 MPixels/s
Direct3D 24.11995 MPixels/s
OpenGL 10.41977 MPixels/s
Memory 678.0203 MB/s
Cached Disk 56.87295 MB/s
Uncached Disk 2.14223 MB/s

Surprisingly, the benchmarks indicates that even a Celeron 448 (4 x 112) is running with 32Mb does not surpass the performance of a Celeron 400 (4 x 100).

The average Winstone 98 results shows that the overclocked Celeron is almost on par with a PII-333 with a score of 19.3 (4 x 100 with 64Mb RAM) and 18.3 (4 x 112 with 32Mb RAM). I would definitely try to get another 64Mb module and test out the Winstone 98 with 64Mb RAM. I think it should score around 20.0 Winstone units.

As for the Wintune 98 results, it clearly indicates that the Celeron 448 (4 x 112) achieves a high score of 1269 MIPS for CPU integer and 512.6 MFLOPS for the CPU FPU. This is a remarkable result.

The video and 3D results are not impressive because of the SiS6326. I have seen reports with 50 - 60 MPixels/s in most of the reputable cards and 40 - 60 MPixels/s for Direct3D.

Read Part V for the the good, bad, and recommendations.

 

WB01343_.gif (599 bytes)WB01345_.gif (616 bytes)

13 September 1998 11:33 AM